His criticism aims at several targets which are at different level of abstraction:
* any attempt to create one final authoritative bottleneck which channels the knowledge onto society is wrong, regardless whether it is a Wikipedia or any algorithmically created system producing meta informations,
* sterile style of wiki writing is undesirable because:
o it removes the touch with the real author of original information, it filters the subtlety of his opinions, essential information (e.g. incl. graphical context of original sources) is lost,
o it creates the false sense of authority behind the information,
* collective authorship tends to produce or align to mainstream or organizational beliefs,
* he worries that collectively created works may be manipulated behind the scene by anonymous groups of editors who bear no visible responsibility,
o and that this kind of activity might create future totalitarian systems as these are basically grounded on misbehaved collectives which oppress individuals.
NOTE: the above dot points are taken from wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaron_Lanier). Funnily enough I don't think this source of information would be something that approved of by the aforementioned author.
No comments:
Post a Comment